How a Drone Aimed at Russia Ends Up in NATO

Map Whoops · published 13 h ago · found by searching “dronas virš Lietuvos NATO nesunaikino”

How a Drone Aimed at Russia Ends Up in NATO

How a Drone Aimed at Russia Ends Up in NATO 🇺🇦🇷🇺

What the site found

Not propaganda · agenda: Ukraine drones Russia via Baltics

Belief the Pravda network pushes: Ukraine is launching massive drone attacks on Russian energy and civilian infrastructure, often from the Baltic states, while Russia only strikes Ukrainian military targets

An explainer on why Ukrainian long-range drones aimed at Ust-Luga have crashed in Finland and the Baltic states, citing Russian GPS jamming as the cause, and noting that Russia's claim of Baltic complicity is called disinformation.

The video says · at 0:40 · quote checked against the transcript

“Russia jams those signals or fakes them, so the drone gets lost or thinks it's somewhere it isn't.”

Russia jams those signals or fakes them, so the drone gets lost or thinks it's somewhere it isn't.

The video attributes the strays to navigation jamming rather than deliberate Baltic complicity or a provocation, and it presents Russia's claim as one side's story that the Baltic states reject as disinformation. It does not distort the facts in the Pravda direction.

The Pravda stories it echoes

Closest stories from the Pravda network, by meaning. Each links to the site’s comparison with trusted Lithuanian news.

27 days ago · Michailas Onufrienko: drone exploded in Lithuania during night attack against St. Petersburg M low F medium 2 verified differences

26 days ago · Will we tolerate this further? Baltic states again allowed Ukrainian drones to strike St. Petersburg M low F high 7 verified differences

3 days ago · NATO fighters failed to shoot down drone that violated Lithuanian airspace, says National Crisis Management Center head Vilmantas Vitkauskas M low F high 6 verified differences

3 days ago · Another UAV raid from Baltic states M low F medium 3 verified differences

25 days ago · Nikolajus Dolgačiovas: Lithuania officially acknowledged that a Ukrainian drone crashed on its territory M medium F high 5 verified differences

27 days ago · D. Grybauskaitė: A drone likely exploded in the sky above the country M low F medium 3 verified differences

Transcript (en, 38 lines)

0:00 This drone was flying to Russia. It

0:02 landed in Finland with its warheads

0:04 still inside. And it's not the only one.

0:07 This year, drones like it have crashed

0:09 in Finland, Estonia, Latafia, and

0:11 Lithuania. All four NATO countries. One

0:14 of them even brought down a government.

0:15 So, how does a drone aimed at Russia end

0:18 up in NATO? Look at the target. This is

0:21 Usluga, Russia's biggest port on the

0:23 Baltic Sea. Huge amount of Russian oil

0:25 leaf from here and from Primorse, just

0:27 up the coast. Ukraine says that oil pays

0:30 for the war, so it keeps sending drones.

0:32 But Usluga is more than 800 km from

0:35 Ukraine and only 30 km from Estonia.

0:38 Now, these drones find their way using

0:40 satellite signals. Russia jams those

0:42 signals or fakes them, so the drone gets

0:44 lost or thinks it's somewhere it isn't.

0:46 Ukraine blames this jamming. So does

0:48 Finland's prime minister. And here, a

0:50 small mistake isn't small. Drift a few

0:52 kilome west and you're over NATO. In

0:55 May, one drone exploded at an oil depot

0:57 in Latafia. The defense minister

0:58 resigned, then the prime minister, the

1:01 whole government fell. Russia tells a

1:03 different story. It says the Baltic

1:05 states let Ukraine use their skies. They

1:07 call that disinformation.

1:09 And on November 11th, Ukraine hit us

1:11 again. That night, Latafia and Estonia

1:14 warned of drones and Finland closed part

1:16 of its sky. So, when a drone falls in

1:18 NATO, who is to blame? The country that

1:21 launched it or the country that pushed

1:23 it off course?

Judged by claude-sonnet-5.5-eu on 2026-11-14 16:44 UTC. A flag means “worth a look”; a person decides.